Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 15:26:11 -0500 (CDT)
From: RJ-
Subject: Re: Spin-doctoring the Ariane 5 launch
>The first Ariane-5 flight did not result in validation of
>Europe's new launcher.
Translation: It blew up.
>It was the first flight test of an entirely new vehicle each of
>whose elements had been tested on the ground in the course
>of the past years and months.
Translation: It never blew up on the ground.
>Of an entirely new design, the launcher uses engines ten times
>as powerful as those of the Ariane-4 series. Its electronic
>brain is a hundred times more powerful than that used on
>previous Ariane launchers. The very many qualification
>reviews and ground tests imposed extremely tough checks on
>the correctness of all the choices made. There are, however,
>no absolute guarantees. A launcher's capability can be
>demonstrated only in flight under actual launch conditions.
Translation: It was bigger and prettier than our previous toy. But it still blew up.
>A second test already scheduled under the development plan
>will take place in a few months' time. Before that, everything
>will have to be done to establish the reasons for this setback
>and make the corrections necessary for a successful second
>test. An inquiry board will be set up in the next few days.
>It will be required to submit, by mid-July, an entirely
>independent report identifying the causes of the incident and
>proposing modifications designed to prevent any further
>incidents.
Translation: We have 6 weeks to come up with a good excuse or they won't let us blow up another one.
>Ariane-5 is a major challenge for space activities in Europe.
>The skills of all the teams involved in the programme,
>coupled with the determination and solidarity of all the
>political, technical and industrial authorities, make us
>confident of a successful outcome.
Translation: We haven't figured out which poor bastard to fire for blowing the damn thing up, yet.
RJ "After you try selling to NASA, this all makes sense" Johnson
Back to Tina's Humor Archives main page